|
Dear professor Fried:
I am responsible for security at a college stadium and wonder what needs to
be done to secure the perimeter of a facility? J.L., Florida
Gil Fried, J.D. |
Dear J.L.
While numerous security issues are examined within a facility, there is not
as much emphasis placed on external concerns. Industry professionals take seriously
perimeter safety concerns. However, sometimes confusion arises concerning jurisdiction
or responsibility for various safety concerns. For example, if protestors are
marching in front of a facility is it the facility’s responsibility to ensure
safety or is it up to the municipal authorities to act? The primary concerns
associated with perimeter safety focus on personnel entry management, vehicular
entry management and parking lot management.
Personnel Entry Management. Personnel entry management focuses on how
to monitor and manage individuals attempting to enter a facility. Biometric
and facial recognition systems are used for entry management when someone is
entering a facility, but what systems can be used when individuals are not yet
near the entrance, but on the street? For example, what strategies or equipment/systems
are in place that can identify when someone is casing the outside of the facility
to gauge security strategies in preparation for a terrorist attack?
Patrons can be monitored in several ways, from roving security patrols to video
surveillance. The options are almost limitless. A new device called Sky Watch
allows four to five officers to be elevated in crane-like device from the ground
to as high as 24 feet in seconds. Such a visible device couples with greater
monitoring options can be a deterrent for some conduct.
Fencing still is the best technique, when patrons need to be kept out. New
fencing that is attractive and practical is being developed. One solution is
WireWall, which cannot be climbed or cut because small gaps between each link
prevents fingers and cutters from penetrating gaps.
The two primary concerns for patron management include communication and video
systems. For examples, alarms are critical, but a communication system can let
patrons know about an alarm and possibly discourage them from attempting to
enter from the beginning. Video surveillance can have the same effect.
Communication Systems. Any signage effort needs to be undertaken in
a uniform manner to educate patrons about different policies and procedures.
Patrons often are calmer and reassured when they know they are standing in the
right line and progress is being made. A display system can communicate proper
gate assignments; list banned items and note the estimated waiting time for
individuals waiting to get into the facility.
Signs need to be displayed conspicuously at entries, choke points, entry roads
and even freeway offramps. Signs need to be legible from far enough away that
people with vision limitations do not need to move to the sign, causing delays
and movement interruption. Displays should avoid visual clutter and use consistent
colors, shapes, and information to develop familiarity.
Entry management needs to focus on keeping fans/customers calm and passive
while waiting to enter the facility. The waiting time to enter a facility can
be stressful and difficult, especially for people accompanied by children, or
who have disabilities, alcohol/drug issues and those in need of restroom facilities.
Signage is one solution to entertain and educate these patrons. Video monitors
also can be used, but they generally are closer to the facility rather than
at the perimeter.
Video Monitoring. Closed Circuit Televisions (CCTV) can be used to monitor
entry and egress procedures and actions for surveillance monitoring and litigation
assistance. New video systems also can help identify events from security breaches
to false alarms. CCTV systems can monitor entrances and exits and the data can
be retrieved immediately and analyzed to determine what caused an alarm.
CCTV systems are primarily analog or digital. Analog has been around for years
and is known for its often-grainy pictures — the kind typically seen when the
film of a bank robbery is shown. Digital is the more effective option. It allows
images to be enlarged without losing significant clarity. Less storage space
is required for the images and the images can be enhanced without distortion.
Analog systems often can be purchased for several hundred dollars, depending
on the number of cameras. Digital systems normally start at just over $1,000
through $15,000 for basic systems.
The “photophone” now combines CCTV technology with the ability to transfer
images anywhere for immediate access and assistance. A photo can be taken in
a command center and sent digitally to a security person. In the future, these
systems might be expanded to include smell, hearing, and touch. Current systems
allow for secure, Internet-based, high-speed, bi-directional monitoring to allow
multiple facilities and sites to be monitored at the same time from completely
different locations.
Policies. It should be noted that while implementing surveillance systems
and alarm systems are important, they have little value if personnel are not
properly trained in security protocols. An alarm system has minimal value if
employees fail to turn on the alarms, do not track the monitors, or override
the system to prop doors open for innocuous activities such as smoking or to
get fresh air.
Vehicular Entry Management. Vehicular entry management focuses on preventing
the wrong vehicles from entering the facility. With the 1995 World Trade Center
bombing, 9/11 and countless other attacks around the world, terrorists have
shown a willingness to use vehicles as weapons. While it is hard to control
aircraft without federal authorities getting involved, cars, trucks and vans
can be controlled.
Vehicular concerns need to be moved as far away as possible from the facility
entrance, which is why checking vehicles at the perimeter is critical. Vehicle
inspection can range from questioning drivers to inspecting the cargo or using
a mirror to inspect underneath a vehicle. Take special care to monitor delivery
trucks because they have the size to hide numerous items and they often are
inspected infrequently if they make regular stops at the facility. Video images
often are taken, but all vehicles entering the perimeter should be logged in,
noting all materials delivered to the facility. Care should be taken to determine
where deliveries are going in facility. Numerous facilities contact the person
to whom the delivery is addressed to make sure they are expecting a delivery
and to allow them to inspect the delivery at the loading dock rather than first
taking it inside the building. Since many delivery trucks are rentals, besides
recording license plates, driver license info also should be recorded before
allowing a vehicle driver to proceed to the facility.
Parking Lot Management. Vehicular entry management is even more critical
when a facility has a parking structure under the primary facility. Any attack
within the garage can possibly cause the facility to collapse. However, the
perimeter parking concerns are just as important. While terrorist might want
to attack as close as possible to a building to cause the greatest damage, criminals
prefer to operate further from security posts. Examine local crime statistics
to determine whether crime is an issue affecting outlying locations. Consult
local police to help determine appropriate action.
Since a parameter can be several blocks to several miles in distance, effectively
patrolling outlying parking areas is critical. Horse-mounted patrols going through
a crowd can have a calming effect on patrons and often are able to reach remote
areas faster. From their raised position, mounted security personnel also have
a better line of sight to monitor the crowd. Thus, if there is a choice between
a motorized inspection and a horse-mounted unit, and cost is not an issue, consider
trying the horsemounted patrol option. A side benefit of horse-mounted patrols
is the positive feeling generated by kids wanting to see and touch the horse.
Besides horses, dogs can be utilized to check for illegal or unauthorized items.
However, to avoid frightening people dogs need to be on tight leashes.
While all the previously discussed perimeter security systems/strategies are
important, they are best utilized in a combined system. Enterprise security
information systems coordinate all facets of the security plan including crime
vulnerability analysis, security risk surveys, electronic security systems,
guard patrol management, incident tracking, life safety system, security management
system and even building/HVAC management system. Through integration systems
all these elements can communicate with one another to provide a seamless communication
network, so one security system can know what is going on with another system.
Editor’s Note: We all have had nagging questions and times when we did
not know where to turn for the answers. We are not talking about questions such
as what were the names of the singers in Menudo. We are talking about facility
security questions. Those industry professionals who are lucky enough to have
a mentor might have someone to call. Others have developed a network of other
executives who can help answer certain questions. However, many people make
decisions in a vacuum without appropriate answers. Such an approach can lead
to a lucky decision or a major disaster. To help solve this problem, Public
Venue Security is pleased to announce a new column focused on answering
critical concerns and questions raised by our readers.
Our columnist is Gil Fried, an associate professor at the University of New
Haven where he coordinates graduate programs in Management of Sports Industries
and Facility Management, which are endorsed by the International Association
of Assembly Managers (IAAM). Fried has worked with the IAAM on various projects
from train the trainer programs to developing case studies for the International
Crowd Management Conference. He is a well-known attorney in the sport facility
area and serves as general counsel for several sport facility associations.
He also serves as the director of risk management for OR&L Facility Management
where he helps monitor risks and safety issues for several million square feet
of public facilities managed by the company. He has written several books on
risk and facility management and speaks extensively throughout the country.
Public Venue Security is honored to have him both on its advisory board
and to answer your questions. You can contact him by e-mail at gfried@newhaven.edu.
For more information, visit www.gilfried.com.
|