|
Shining Light on CCTV
By Khali Henderson
Installing CCTV cameras is a
standard and effective component of any comprehensive security system, but its
contribution is diminished or enhanced by the venue’s lighting conditions.
The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) wrote the book
on lighting. Recently, its Security Lighting Committee issued guidelines
(G-1-03) for security lighting that include recommendations on lighting for
photographic surveillance. (An online course also is available.) According to
the guidelines, the most important illumination factors are the type, quality
and quantity of available light.
Type. The type or source of light can be natural, such as the sun or
moon, or electric, such as incandescent, fluorescent or high-intensity
discharge.
At one extreme is the incandescent lamp, which is the least expensive but
also the least efficient in converting energy to light. Its main benefits are
low cost, good color rendition and ease of installation.At the other extreme is
the low pressure sodium lamp, which is fairly expensive to purchase, has no
color rendering ability, but is extremely efficient at producing light. The
other light sources fall between these extremes. For CCTV surveillance, color
rendering can be more or less important depending on the need to identify a
person’s appearance in detail.
Quality. The quality refers to the light’s compatibility with the image
sensor, pixels in today’s CCD cameras. Characteristic differences in the
spectral response among the sources can affect the image.
Quantity. The intensity of light needed by the camera imager.
This can be further reduced or attenuated by light reflecting off surfaces in
the scene. The amount of light falling or reflected on a scene can be determined
with an illuminance meter, according to the IESNA, which recommends readings be
taken from the location where the camera lens will be positioned and in the
direction in which it might be pointed.
The sophistication of today’s equipment can compensate for lowlight
scenarios, says lighting designer Doug Paulin, owner of Lighting Forensics and a
past chairman of the IESNA Security Lighting Committee.
CCTV manufacturers specify the required amount of illumination — also known
as minimum scene illumination — for their cameras in lux. This value relates the
actual energy per unit-area falling on a surface to what the human eye
perceives. A sunny day would be about 100,000 lux while a full moon at night
would be about 0.1 lux. For cameras, CCTV experts say the lower the lux rating,
the lower the light levels at which it will produce an acceptable image. Thus,
cameras with low lux ratings are said to be more light-sensitive. Monochrome
cameras generally are more sensitive and have lower lux level ratings than color
cameras and, therefore, will produce acceptable images in lower light conditions
than will color cameras.
While lux ratings offer some indication of the camera’s sensitivity, they are
not always useful in side-by-side comparison, says Ramon Duran, vice president
of product development for Samsung CCTV. He explains that manufacturers assign
lux ratings based on non-standard measures. So, while one would assume that a
camera requiring a minimum scene illumination of .05 lux would be twice as
sensitive as one requiring .1 lux. However, Duran says this is not necessarily
the case as there are two other variables to consider.
One is the lens aperture. “If one is f-stop 1.0 and the other is 1.4, you
can’t compare” the lux rating because one camera is set to let in twice as much
light as the other, he says. Another variable in calculating the lux level is
how manufacturers measure the light output as expressed in units called IRE,
with black equal to 0 and white equal to 100. Ramon says the logical approach is
to use a baseline of 50 IREs, but some cameras use 25 or 30, making it more
difficult to compare apples to apples.A similar problem can occur when
considering reflectance, light reflected from the surface back to the camera.
These discrepancies are a running concern for the security industry, and at
the behest of the FBI, the Security Industry Association is considering creating
standards for scene illumination, says Hunter Knight, director and chair of
SIA’s technical committee, which is developing standards for video quality. In a
February meeting of interested parties, the lighting question was raised, he
says, but so far it is not officially part of the agenda.
Duran says, given the misinformation, it’s important that sample cameras are
obtained to check their performance under actual lighting conditions.
|